9 Comments
User's avatar
Marc Dann's avatar

Perhaps DeWine will reconsider and request the $900 Million due to 330,000 Ohioans who were unemployed during the pandemic not that the 10th District Court of appeals had ordered him to do so. https://www.cleveland.com/news/2025/06/appeals-court-gov-mike-dewine-must-seek-300-per-week-federal-pandemic-unemployment-benefits-for-300000-ohioans.html

Expand full comment
Glenn Reihing's avatar

What about the provision about protecting internal lawmaker's documents for corruption discovery??

Expand full comment
Nicholas's avatar

Brother, I hope you realize they're playing 3D chess. This was all a telegraphed move to brand DeWine (and by extension Tressel) as a RINO on behalf of Ramaswindle.

Expand full comment
M Test's avatar

Thank you for this summation and the reminder we must celebrate any small victory we can in these awful times.

Expand full comment
Brandon's avatar

You know what I always think of when anyone mentions a flat tax? When Hulk Hogan “ran for president” and did an interview on the Tonight Show and Jay Leno asked him his tax plan and he said “Flat tax, brother.”

That’s how I know that’s a stupid idea

Expand full comment
Muad’dib's avatar

That, and the fact that CBus’ own Randy Macho Man Savage called Terry a scab for helping to stop wrestlers unionize. The flat tax will always rise to the top.

Expand full comment
Muad’dib's avatar

Mike DeWine is a literal criminal and every time to thank him for being slightly less sociopathic than Huffman you normalize this shit as bad as legacy media. Maintaining access is one thing, but Mike is a stone cold POS and we all should die on that hill together, cause he’d happily let us die in the valley, too, for a marginal return to his handlers.

Expand full comment
Penny Winkle's avatar

Welcome to Florida of the North.

Expand full comment
Tom Jackson's avatar

DeWine's comments in the written explanation for the homeless shelter veto seem worth quoting: “The reality is that a homeless child has been through a horrible experience and likely needs to be met where that child is at emotionally. If a shelter has to call a homeless youth a pronoun that is incongruent with that youth’s gender to get that person into a shelter so the child won’t freeze to death, it needs to be done without fear of getting funding clawed back. No Ohio youth should be denied shelter from a facility that receives state funds".

Expand full comment