Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Progressive Donkey's avatar

I’d love to see The Rooster produce a candidate & issue endorsement postcard.

- - -

For basically my entire eligible voter life I’ve relied on party endorsement postcards to do my thinking for me. It is what it is, and what it is is a shame.

At the same time, given the amount of establishment party corruption cover up, I likely wouldn’t have uncovered enough truths to vote off book, even if I had been doing my own research.

Which is to say The Rooster is doing a bang up job of showing us what’s going on behind the curtain. I’m grateful to the friend who told me about DJ’s news rag. If he hadn’t, I would be voting for Ross, a hack and phony with a nice headshot.

Again, I’d love to see The Rooster produce a candidate & issue endorsement postcard.

Expand full comment
Joe Motil's avatar

You know I appreciate everything you do, but I must disagree with your assessment of giving Hardin kudo’s for appointing a placeholder instead of appointing someone and giving them an advantage of incumbency.

First of all, Hardin uses his position of power to inform potential applicants for an open seat stating they are not permitted to run for the seat. That’s BS. Hardin has recently created this “placeholder seat” while appointing party insiders while attempting to show the public that the appointment process is now on the up and up. We all know it is not. The candidate for the open seat has been chosen ahead of time and will be automatically be given the FCDP endorsement. In this case Tiara Ross. If Ross loses (which I believe she will), I look to see Hardin and company to go back to its old ways of appointing someone and giving them that advantage of incumbency to run for the open seat.

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts